5D Library › Crystal Piezoelectricity, Iron-Nickel Meteorites and Photobiomodulation · 中文

Chapter 6 The Schumann Resonances and Earthing

The Earth as a resonator

Lightning strikes somewhere on Earth around fifty times a second. Each stroke radiates electromagnetic energy over a wide band, including extremely low frequencies with wavelengths of thousands of kilometres. At those frequencies the conducting ground and the conducting lower ionosphere, some 60–90 km up, form the two walls of a spherical waveguide that wraps around the whole planet. Waves that travel all the way round and arrive back in step reinforce one another, so the cavity resonates.

In 1952 the German physicist Winfried Otto Schumann calculated the resonant frequencies of an idealised cavity of this kind (Schumann 1952). The resonances were first clearly observed by Balser and Wagner in 1960 (Balser and Wagner 1960). For a lossless thin shell of radius RR, the frequencies are

fn=c2πRn(n+1),n=1,2,3,…f_n = \frac{c}{2\pi R}\sqrt{n(n+1)}, \qquad n = 1, 2, 3, \dots

Calculation

The ideal frequencies for the first five modes, compared with the typical observed peaks.

import math

# Schumann's ideal (lossless) Earth–ionosphere cavity:
#   f_n = c / (2π R) · √(n (n + 1))
c, R = 2.998e8, 6.371e6
OBSERVED = [7.83, 14.3, 20.8, 27.3, 33.8]          # Hz, typical observed peaks
f0 = c / (2 * math.pi * R)
print(f"c / 2πR = {f0:.2f} Hz")
for n, obs in enumerate(OBSERVED, start=1):
    ideal = f0 * math.sqrt(n * (n + 1))
    print(f"n = {n}: ideal {ideal:5.1f} Hz, observed ≈ {obs:4.1f} Hz, ratio {obs / ideal:.2f}")

lam = c / OBSERVED[0]
print(f"wavelength at 7.83 Hz ≈ {lam / 1e3:,.0f} km; Earth's circumference ≈ {2 * math.pi * R / 1e3:,.0f} km")
# c / 2πR = 7.49 Hz
# n = 1: ideal  10.6 Hz, observed ≈  7.8 Hz, ratio 0.74
# n = 2: ideal  18.3 Hz, observed ≈ 14.3 Hz, ratio 0.78
# n = 3: ideal  25.9 Hz, observed ≈ 20.8 Hz, ratio 0.80
# n = 4: ideal  33.5 Hz, observed ≈ 27.3 Hz, ratio 0.82
# n = 5: ideal  41.0 Hz, observed ≈ 33.8 Hz, ratio 0.82
# wavelength at 7.83 Hz ≈ 38,289 km; Earth's circumference ≈ 40,030 km

The ideal formula gives 10.6 Hz for the fundamental, but the observed peak is near 7.8 Hz, and all the modes are lower by about a fifth to a quarter. The difference is physics, not error: the ionosphere is not a perfect conductor, and its finite, height-dependent conductivity lowers the frequencies and broadens the peaks (Nickolaenko and Hayakawa 2002). The spacing still follows the n(n+1)\sqrt{n(n+1)} pattern roughly, and the wavelength of the fundamental is close to the Earth’s circumference, as the simple picture suggests.

Evidence

The Schumann resonances are weak. Their magnetic component is of the order of a picotesla, about ten million times weaker than the Earth’s static magnetic field, and their frequency and intensity vary with the time of day and with global thunderstorm activity, which is concentrated over Africa, South-east Asia and the Americas. They are used to monitor worldwide lightning and the state of the lower ionosphere (Nickolaenko and Hayakawa 2002).

The fundamental at 7.8 Hz lies near the brain’s alpha band, and this coincidence has led to claims that the brain is “tuned” to the Earth or that devices emitting 7.83 Hz restore a natural rhythm. Chapter 6 of The Default Mode Network, the Entropic Brain and Neural Oscillations, the previous book in the 5D Library, showed how hard it is to entrain brain rhythms even with stimuli delivered directly to the eyes and ears; a field of a picotesla, far weaker than the fields from household wiring, offers no plausible route. This book makes no claim that Schumann-frequency devices have any effect on health.

Earthing

“Earthing” or “grounding” means connecting the body electrically to the ground, by walking barefoot on soil or by sleeping or sitting on a conductive mat or sheet wired to the earth connection of a building’s electrical system. Its proponents say that the Earth’s surface supplies free electrons that reduce inflammation and improve sleep and many other aspects of health.

The part that physics can check is what grounding does to the body’s electric potential. A person in a building is capacitively coupled to the mains wiring around them and also to the ground; together these form a voltage divider.

Calculation

A capacitive divider for a person lying in bed: coupling to 120 V, 60 Hz wiring through about 1.6 pF, and 150 pF from body to ground. Then the same person connected to ground through a low resistance and through 100 kΩ, typical of the safety resistor in grounding products.

import math

# A person lying in bed near mains wiring: a capacitive voltage divider.
f, V_mains = 60.0, 120.0       # US mains, as in the measurements reported by Applewhite
C_couple = 1.6e-12             # F, wiring-to-body coupling (chosen to give ~1.3 V)
C_body = 150e-12               # F, body-to-ground capacitance
w = 2 * math.pi * f

V_float = V_mains * C_couple / (C_couple + C_body)
print(f"ungrounded body: ≈ {V_float:.2f} V (reported: 1.24–1.32 V)")

# Grounded through a resistance R (pad, wiring and a ~100 kΩ safety resistor):
for R in (1e3, 100e3):
    Zc = 1 / (w * C_couple)                 # the coupling capacitor sets the current
    I = V_mains / Zc
    print(f"grounded via {R / 1e3:5.0f} kΩ: current {I * 1e9:.0f} nA, body ≈ {I * R * 1e3:5.2f} mV")
print("reported with a grounding pad: about 0.01 V")
print(f"the current is ≈ {0.5e-3 / I:,.0f} times below the 0.5 mA threshold of perception")
# ungrounded body: ≈ 1.27 V (reported: 1.24–1.32 V)
# grounded via     1 kΩ: current 72 nA, body ≈  0.07 mV
# grounded via   100 kΩ: current 72 nA, body ≈  7.24 mV
# reported with a grounding pad: about 0.01 V
# the current is ≈ 6,908 times below the 0.5 mA threshold of perception

Evidence

In measurements reviewed by Chevalier and colleagues, the 60 Hz voltage induced on the body of a person in bed was about 1.2–1.3 V, and fell to about 0.01 V when the person was grounded through a conductive bed pad, a reduction by a factor of about seventy (Applewhite 2005; Chevalier et al. 2012). The same review reports studies suggesting effects on sleep, pain, blood viscosity and markers of inflammation; most were small, many were not blinded, and the review’s authors disclosed that three of them were contractors for, and shareholders in, a company that sponsors earthing research (Chevalier et al. 2012).

The simple divider reproduces the measured voltages: about 1.3 V floating, a few to ten millivolts when grounded. The current flowing to ground is less than a ten-thousandth of what a person can feel (International Electrotechnical Commission 2005). So grounding really does change the body’s electrical environment, by draining static charge and reducing a small induced alternating voltage. What remains unproven is that this change has the health effects claimed. A floating potential of a volt is harmless, and nobody has shown a physiological mechanism by which removing it would reduce inflammation.

Hypothesis · not established

Not established. Reported improvements in sleep and pain with grounding mats come from expectation and from the routine that accompanies their use, not from the electrical connection. The hypothesis predicts that in a pre-registered trial in which half the mats have their ground connection disconnected inside the plug, unknown to participants and assessors, sleep and pain outcomes will not differ between real and sham grounding. It would be refuted if real grounding were better by a margin specified in advance.

Note

Electrical safety. A mat connected to a socket’s earth depends on the building’s wiring being correct. Never improvise a connection, never insert meter probes or wires into a mains socket, and do not use grounding products in buildings with known wiring faults or during thunderstorms.

References

Applewhite, R. 2005. “The Effectiveness of a Conductive Patch and a Conductive Bed Pad in Reducing Induced Human Body Voltage via the Application of Earth Ground.” European Biology and Bioelectromagnetics 1: 23–40.
Balser, M., and C. A. Wagner. 1960. “Observations of Earth–Ionosphere Cavity Resonances.” Nature 188: 638–41.
Chevalier, Gaétan, Stephen T. Sinatra, James L. Oschman, Karol Sokal, and Pawel Sokal. 2012. “Earthing: Health Implications of Reconnecting the Human Body to the Earth’s Surface Electrons.” Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2012: 291541.
International Electrotechnical Commission. 2005. Effects of Current on Human Beings and Livestock – Part 1: General Aspects. IEC TS 60479-1.
Nickolaenko, A. P., and M. Hayakawa. 2002. Resonances in the Earth–Ionosphere Cavity. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schumann, W. O. 1952. “Über Die Strahlungslosen Eigenschwingungen Einer Leitenden Kugel, Die von Einer Luftschicht Und Einer Ionosphärenhülle Umgeben Ist.” Zeitschrift Für Naturforschung A 7 (2): 149–54.

Fan, Y. (2026). Crystal Piezoelectricity, Iron-Nickel Meteorites and Photobiomodulation: Alpha-Quartz, Tourmaline Pyroelectricity, Widmanstätten Diffusion and Near-Infrared Cytochrome c Oxidase in Solid-State Physics and Biophotonics [晶体压电性、铁镍陨石与光生物调节] (Version 1.0.0). 5D Library. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23698498 · Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).