5D Library › Crystal Piezoelectricity, Iron-Nickel Meteorites and Photobiomodulation · 中文

Chapter 2 Tourmaline and Pyroelectricity

The stone that pulls ash

Around 315 BC Theophrastus described a stone he called lyngourion that attracted straws and bits of wood; he thought it formed from the urine of a wild animal, which Pliny later identified as the lynx. Many historians think the stone was tourmaline (Lang 2005). The property was rediscovered in Europe when tourmaline from Ceylon reached the Netherlands at the start of the eighteenth century: Dutch gem cutters noticed that a stone placed in a fire first attracted ash from the coals and then repelled it, as Johann Georg Schmidt reported in 1707. Franz Aepinus studied the effect experimentally in the eighteenth century, and in 1824 David Brewster gave it the name it still has, pyroelectricity (Lang 2005).

Why tourmaline and not quartz

A crystal is pyroelectric if it has a spontaneous polarisation, a built-in electric dipole moment per unit volume, which changes with temperature. That requires a polar crystal class, one with a single direction that is not equivalent to its reverse. Ten of the 32 classes are polar. Tourmaline belongs to the trigonal class 3m3m, which is polar along the crystal’s cc axis; quartz, class 32, is not polar, so it is piezoelectric but not pyroelectric (Chapter 1).

In a crystal at constant temperature, the polarisation’s bound charges at the two ends are soon covered by free charges from the air and from surface conduction, and nothing can be detected. When the temperature changes by ΔT\Delta T, the polarisation changes by

ΔP=pΔT,\Delta P = p\,\Delta T,

where pp is the pyroelectric coefficient, and for a while the surfaces carry an uncompensated charge density σ=pΔT\sigma = p\,\Delta T.

Evidence

For tourmaline the pyroelectric coefficient is about 4 µC m⁻² K⁻¹. Most of it is “secondary”: thermal expansion strains the crystal, which then produces charge by piezoelectricity; the “primary” part at fixed shape is only about an eighth of the total (Lang 2005). By comparison, the synthetic ferroelectric lithium tantalate used in infrared sensors has a coefficient more than forty times larger. In a study of tourmalines of different compositions, the coefficient fell linearly with iron content, from about 3.9 µC m⁻² K⁻¹ for iron-free (pink elbaite-like) compositions to about 2 µC m⁻² K⁻¹ for the iron-rich end-member schorl (Hawkins et al. 1995).

Calculation

A 1 cm tourmaline cube with its cc axis vertical, warmed by 1, 2 and 5 K. The field just outside an isolated face is about σ/ε0\sigma/\varepsilon_0; the open-circuit voltage across the crystal is V=σL/(ε0εr)V = \sigma L/(\varepsilon_0\varepsilon_r).

# A 1 cm × 1 cm × 1 cm tourmaline crystal, c axis vertical, warmed by ΔT.
eps0 = 8.854e-12
p = 4.0e-6           # C m⁻² K⁻¹, magnitude for iron-poor tourmaline
eps_r = 7.0          # relative permittivity along c (order of magnitude)
A, L = 1e-4, 0.01    # face area (m²) and length along c (m)
e = 1.602e-19

for dT in (1, 2, 5):
    sigma = p * dT                       # surface charge density, C/m²
    E_air = sigma / eps0                 # field just outside an isolated face
    V = sigma * L / (eps0 * eps_r)       # open-circuit voltage across the crystal
    Q = sigma * A
    print(f"ΔT = {dT} K: σ = {sigma * 1e6:4.0f} µC/m², field at face ≈ {E_air / 1e6:4.2f} kV/mm, "
          f"V ≈ {V / 1e3:4.1f} kV, charge {Q * 1e9:.1f} nC = {Q / e:.1e} e")
print("dielectric breakdown of dry air ≈ 3 kV/mm")
# ΔT = 1 K: σ =    4 µC/m², field at face ≈ 0.45 kV/mm, V ≈  0.6 kV, charge 0.4 nC = 2.5e+09 e
# ΔT = 2 K: σ =    8 µC/m², field at face ≈ 0.90 kV/mm, V ≈  1.3 kV, charge 0.8 nC = 5.0e+09 e
# ΔT = 5 K: σ =   20 µC/m², field at face ≈ 2.26 kV/mm, V ≈  3.2 kV, charge 2.0 nC = 1.2e+10 e
# dielectric breakdown of dry air ≈ 3 kV/mm

These are real and impressive numbers. A warming of a few degrees produces a field at the crystal’s ends approaching the breakdown strength of air, which is why a warmed tourmaline attracts dust and ash, and why its ends can give small sparks when heated strongly. In a vacuum, where no air ions can neutralise the charge, a heated pyroelectric crystal of lithium tantalate has produced fields strong enough to accelerate ions to nuclear fusion in a laboratory demonstration (Naranjo et al. 2005).

Charge is not a supply of ions

Tourmaline is widely sold as a source of “negative ions”, in jewellery, textiles, hair dryers and mattress pads. Two facts limit what it can do. First, charge is produced only while the temperature is changing; at steady temperature, for example against skin at a stable 33 °C, the production stops. Second, the charge is small, and in ordinary air it is mostly neutralised by attracting ions that already exist rather than by creating new ones.

Calculation

How the charge from the 5 K warming above compares with the ions that natural radioactivity and cosmic rays keep producing in a small bedroom; and the pyroelectric coefficient for four iron contents, from the fit of Hawkins and colleagues.

# How much air ionisation could that charge account for?
e = 1.602e-19
Q = 4.0e-6 * 5 * 1e-4            # C, the 5 K case from the previous program
ions_once = Q / e
room = 30.0                      # m³, a small bedroom
natural_rate = 10 * 1e6          # ion pairs per m³ per second (≈ 10 per cm³ per s indoors)
print(f"at most {ions_once:.1e} ions, once, for a 5 K change")
print(f"natural ionisation of the room makes {natural_rate * room:.0e} pairs per second")
print(f"→ equivalent to {ions_once / (natural_rate * room):.0f} s of background ionisation,")
print("  and nothing at all while the temperature stays constant")

# Iron lowers the coefficient (Hawkins et al. 1995, 296 K, FeO in wt%).
for name, feo in (("iron-free (pink elbaite)", 0.0), ("intermediate", 7.0),
                  ("iron-rich", 14.6), ("schorl end-member", 20.46)):
    print(f"{name:25s} FeO {feo:5.2f} %  p ≈ {3.949 - 0.094 * feo:.2f} µC m⁻² K⁻¹")
# at most 1.2e+10 ions, once, for a 5 K change
# natural ionisation of the room makes 3e+08 pairs per second
# → equivalent to 42 s of background ionisation,
#   and nothing at all while the temperature stays constant
# iron-free (pink elbaite)  FeO  0.00 %  p ≈ 3.95 µC m⁻² K⁻¹
# intermediate              FeO  7.00 %  p ≈ 3.29 µC m⁻² K⁻¹
# iron-rich                 FeO 14.60 %  p ≈ 2.58 µC m⁻² K⁻¹
# schorl end-member         FeO 20.46 %  p ≈ 2.03 µC m⁻² K⁻¹

Even if every elementary charge produced by a 5 K warming became a free ion, which it does not, the total would equal less than a minute of the room’s natural ionisation, once. Iron-rich black schorl, the cheapest and most commonly used tourmaline in consumer products, has the lowest coefficient of all.

Evidence

Studies of air ions themselves, produced by electrical ion generators at far higher concentrations than any mineral, give a mixed picture. A meta-analysis found no consistent effect of negative or positive air ions on anxiety, mood, relaxation or comfort; exposure to negative ions, especially at high density, was associated with lower scores on a depression scale, in studies that came mostly from a single research group and whose authors called for further double-blind work (Perez et al. 2013). A companion review found no consistent effect of air ions on breathing or lung function (Alexander et al. 2013).

Hypothesis · not established

Not established. A tourmaline product held at constant temperature does not raise the concentration of small air ions above background. The hypothesis predicts that an air-ion counter placed a few centimetres from a tourmaline-containing product, compared in random order with an identical product without tourmaline in the same room, at the same temperature and humidity, will show no difference beyond the counter’s noise. It would be refuted if the tourmaline product produced a reproducible excess of ions under those conditions.

Note

Air-ion counters are sensitive to static charge on clothes, hands and plastics, and readings near a person or a freshly unpacked product can be misleadingly high. A fair test changes one thing at a time and repeats the measurement in random order.

References

Alexander, Dominik D., William H. Bailey, Vanessa Perez, M. E. Mitchell, and S. Su. 2013. “Air Ions and Respiratory Function Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review.” Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine 12: 14.
Hawkins, K. D., I. D. R. Mackinnon, and H. Schneeberger. 1995. “Influence of Chemistry on the Pyroelectric Effect in Tourmaline.” American Mineralogist 80: 491–501.
Lang, Sidney B. 2005. “Pyroelectricity: From Ancient Curiosity to Modern Imaging Tool.” Physics Today 58 (8): 31–36.
Naranjo, B., J. K. Gimzewski, and S. Putterman. 2005. “Observation of Nuclear Fusion Driven by a Pyroelectric Crystal.” Nature 434: 1115–17.
Perez, Vanessa, Dominik D. Alexander, and William H. Bailey. 2013. “Air Ions and Mood Outcomes: A Review and Meta-Analysis.” BMC Psychiatry 13: 29.

Fan, Y. (2026). Crystal Piezoelectricity, Iron-Nickel Meteorites and Photobiomodulation: Alpha-Quartz, Tourmaline Pyroelectricity, Widmanstätten Diffusion and Near-Infrared Cytochrome c Oxidase in Solid-State Physics and Biophotonics [晶体压电性、铁镍陨石与光生物调节] (Version 1.0.0). 5D Library. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23698498 · Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).