5D Library › The Default Mode Network, the Entropic Brain and Neural Oscillations · 中文

Chapter 2 Neural Oscillations and the Kuramoto Model

The brain’s rhythms

Electrodes on the scalp pick up rhythmic fluctuations produced by large numbers of neurons acting together. Since Hans Berger recorded the alpha rhythm in the 1920s, these rhythms have been sorted into bands, roughly:

Band Frequency Often associated with
Delta about 1–4 Hz deep sleep
Theta about 4–8 Hz memory, navigation, drowsiness
Alpha about 8–12 Hz relaxed wakefulness with eyes closed; suppressing irrelevant input
Beta about 13–30 Hz maintaining the current motor or cognitive state
Gamma about 30–100 Hz, often studied near 40 Hz local processing and binding

The boundaries differ between laboratories, and the “associations” are tendencies, not one-to-one mappings. A useful way to think about these rhythms is that oscillations let groups of neurons coordinate their timing: neurons that fire in phase can influence each other more effectively than neurons that fire at random (Buzsáki and Draguhn 2004).

Coupled oscillators

How do many neurons, each with its own natural rhythm, come to fire together? The same question arises for fireflies flashing in unison, pacemaker cells in the heart and the footfall of people crossing a bridge. In 1975 the physicist Yoshiki Kuramoto proposed a model simple enough to solve and rich enough to show the essential phenomenon (Kuramoto 1984). Each oscillator ii has a phase θi\theta_i and a natural frequency ωi\omega_i, and is pulled towards the others:

θ̇i=ωi+KN∑j=1Nsin⁡(θj−θi)\dot{\theta}_i = \omega_i + \frac{K}{N}\sum_{j=1}^{N}\sin(\theta_j – \theta_i)

where KK is the coupling strength. The degree of synchrony is measured by the order parameter rr, the length of the average of the unit vectors eiθje^{i\theta_j}: r=0r = 0 when the phases are scattered, r=1r = 1 when all are locked together. With the definitions reiψ=1N∑jeiθjr e^{i\psi} = \frac{1}{N}\sum_j e^{i\theta_j}, the equation can be rewritten as θ̇i=ωi+Krsin⁡(ψ−θi)\dot{\theta}_i = \omega_i + K r \sin(\psi – \theta_i): each oscillator feels only the mean field, whose strength itself depends on how synchronised the population is. That feedback is what produces a sudden transition.

For natural frequencies spread according to a Lorentzian distribution of half-width γ\gamma, Kuramoto showed that synchrony is impossible below a critical coupling Kc=2γK_c = 2\gamma and grows as r=1−Kc/Kr = \sqrt{1 – K_c/K} above it (Strogatz 2000).

Calculation

A simulation of 400 oscillators with Lorentzian natural frequencies, compared with Kuramoto’s exact result for an infinite population.

import math, random

def kuramoto_r(K, N=400, gamma=0.5, dt=0.05, steps=1600, seed=1):
    """Order parameter r after the transient, for N oscillators whose natural
    frequencies follow a Lorentzian of half-width gamma (rad/s), measured in
    the rotating frame. Mean-field form of the Kuramoto equation:
    dθi/dt = ωi + K·r·sin(ψ − θi)."""
    omega = [gamma * math.tan(math.pi * ((i + 0.5) / N - 0.5)) for i in range(N)]
    rnd = random.Random(seed)
    th = [rnd.uniform(0, 2 * math.pi) for _ in range(N)]
    rs = []
    for step in range(steps):
        c = sum(math.cos(t) for t in th) / N
        s = sum(math.sin(t) for t in th) / N
        r, psi = math.hypot(c, s), math.atan2(s, c)
        th = [t + dt * (w + K * r * math.sin(psi - t)) for t, w in zip(th, omega)]
        if step >= steps // 2:
            rs.append(r)
    return sum(rs) / len(rs)

gamma = 0.5
print(f"critical coupling Kc = 2γ = {2 * gamma:.1f}")
print("  K    r (simulated)   r (theory, √(1 − Kc/K))")
for K in (0.5, 0.9, 1.1, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0):
    theory = math.sqrt(1 - 2 * gamma / K) if K > 2 * gamma else 0.0
    print(f"{K:4.1f}   {kuramoto_r(K):13.2f}   {theory:10.2f}")
# critical coupling Kc = 2γ = 1.0
#   K    r (simulated)   r (theory, √(1 − Kc/K))
#  0.5            0.08         0.00
#  0.9            0.09         0.00
#  1.1            0.29         0.30
#  1.5            0.57         0.58
#  2.0            0.70         0.71
#  3.0            0.82         0.82
Synchrony against coupling strength. Below the critical value the phases stay scattered; above it, a synchronised cluster appears and grows. The small values below the threshold in the simulation are the random fluctuations of a finite population.

Below the threshold the simulated rr is not exactly zero but about 0.08, roughly what one expects from the random scatter of 400 phases (1/N=0.051/\sqrt{N} = 0.05). Above it the simulation follows the theory closely. The transition is a phase transition in the physicist’s sense: a small change in a control parameter produces a qualitative change in the collective state.

From the model to the brain

The Kuramoto model has been used as a starting point for models of cortical rhythms and of large-scale brain dynamics, with oscillators standing for brain regions and coupling given by anatomical connections and delays (Breakspear et al. 2010). Such models have also been used to explore an idea that is still debated: that the healthy brain operates near a transition between order and disorder, where it can switch flexibly between more and less synchronised states.

Note

The model’s oscillators are abstractions. Real neural populations are not simple phase oscillators, coupling is not all-to-all, and conduction delays matter. “Brainwaves” in the scalp EEG are summed activity of very large populations, and a change in power in a band does not by itself say what the neurons are computing.

Hypothesis · not established

Not established. Sustained, focused attention on a single object, such as the breath, increases the effective coupling within the networks that support attention, so that their activity becomes more coherent, while reducing coupling within the default network. In the language of the Kuramoto model this is a shift in KK for two populations in opposite directions. The hypothesis predicts that, within the same people, phase-locking between frontal and parietal electrodes in the alpha and theta bands increases during breath-focused attention compared with rest, while the coherence of default-network activity estimated from source-localised EEG or fMRI decreases. It would be refuted if neither change appeared in a within-person comparison of adequate size.

References

Breakspear, Michael, Stewart Heitmann, and Andreas Daffertshofer. 2010. “Generative Models of Cortical Oscillations: Neurobiological Implications of the Kuramoto Model.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 4: 190.
Buzsáki, György, and Andreas Draguhn. 2004. “Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks.” Science 304 (5679): 1926–29.
Kuramoto, Yoshiki. 1984. Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence. Springer.
Strogatz, Steven H. 2000. “From Kuramoto to Crawford: Exploring the Onset of Synchronization in Populations of Coupled Oscillators.” Physica D 143: 1–20.

Fan, Y. (2026). The Default Mode Network, the Entropic Brain and Neural Oscillations: 5-HT2A Receptor Kinetics, Pineal Calcite Microcrystals and the Computational Neuroscience of Meditative Attention [默认模式网络、熵脑与神经振荡] (Version 1.0.0). 5D Library. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23697320 · Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).